SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 135

S.D.PANDIT
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK – Appellant
Versus
CHARTERED BANK EMPLOYEES UNION (REGD. ) – Respondent


S. D. Pandit, J.

( 1 ) -THESE three applications aremter-connected. Therefore, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) SUIT No. 2551/95 is brought by the plaintiff Standard Chartered Bank against in all five defendants. Defendant No. 1, Standard Chartered Bank Employees Union is the Union of the employees of the plaintiff Bank whereas defendants 2 to 5 are its office-bearers. Out of these office bearers defendant No. 4 was working in the Loan Centre Unit of the plaintiff s branch at 17, Parliament Street, New Delhi and byletter dated 1. 11. 1995 he has been transferred to Darya Ganj Branch and the said order was served on the defendant No. 4 on 2. 1 11 995. It is the case of the plaintiff that on 3. 11. 1995 the defendants and its members started shouting pitched slogans against the management using filthy language for its officers and created unruly scenes, thumped the tables and caused hindrance to the officers in discharging their duties and also obstructing the customers. Plaintiff further alleges that the defendants have also extended threats of physical violence to the officers of the plaintiff Bank and they have resorted to illegal strike. They had also mad
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top