SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 146

S.K.MAHAJAN
VINOD SALUJA – Appellant
Versus
SITA RANI – Respondent


S. K. Mahajan, J.

( 1 ) THIS order will dispose of the application of the plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 for the grant of an ad-interim order of injunction restraining the defendant from selling, transferring, alienating or creating third party rights in property being House No. N-1, Green Park Extension, New Delhi. Facts, in short, giving rise to the present suit are that : -

( 2 ) BY an agreement alleged to have been entered into between the plaintiffs and the defendants on 15th September, 1994, the defendant had agreed to sell the terrace rights of the property bearing No. N-1, Green Park Extension, New Delhi to the plaintiffs for a total consideration of Rs. 48 lakhs. The agreement is in the form of a receiptcum- agreement on a paper of an exercise book. The defendant has signed on the back side of the said paper on the revenue receipt and the same has been witnessed by the son of the defendant. Certain other documents, namely, affidavit/undertaking, affidavit for submission of building plans, indemnity bond, letter of authority for architect and certain forms for submission to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi and the Ministry of Urban Development, were also signed by











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top