N.G.NANDI
VINIT KUMAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
PRADIP KUMAR GUPTA – Respondent
( 1 ) ON attaining the majority, the plaintiff has filed the suit for declaration that the agreements, one dated 1. 7. 1977 and the other dated 21. 8. 1979, executed between defendants No. 1to 5 and the General Power of Attorney, are null and void and not binding on the plaintiff or alternatively that the same have become infructuous and can not be enforced now and for a decree for possession of the property directing defendant No. 5 to hand over the possession of the suit property to the plaintiff and also restraining defendants 1-4 by permanent injunction from selling the property to defendant No. 5 or to any body else and also further restraining defendant No. 1 from demolishing the original structure built or portion of original construction or any portion and from making any new construction or alienating the property in any manner. The plaintiff by this IA, seeks to restrain defendant No. 5 from further demolishing the original structure or changing physical features of the suit property in any manner or to make fresh construction thereon pending the hearing and disposal of the suit.
( 2 ) THE say of the plaintiff is that by perpetual lease deed dated 8. 3. 19
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.