( 1 ) RULE D. B.

( 2 ) BOTH the parties have filed detailed pleadings and also documents in support of their respective contentions. We have heard learned counsel for the parties at great length and we proceed to decide this petition finally.

( 3 ) THE petitioner was appointed in respondent No. 1 Corporation as Assistant Cashier in April, 1966 and in due course was promoted as Accountant in 1984 and at the relevant time he was posted at Jammu office of respondent No. l as Accountant. He was transferred from Jammu to Udaipur vide office Order dated 20. 12. 1993 which was duly served on him and in pursuance thereof he was relieved from there on 22. 12. 1993. He did not report at Udaipur. On the other hand he made representation dated 22. 12. 1993 against this transfer which was followed by 2/3 more representations but his request was not acceded to and he was directed to report for duty at Udaipur which he did not do. A charge sheet dated 8. 9. 1994 was issued for not complying the transfer order and in due course disciplinary inquiry was held by an Enquiry Committee which submitted their report to the authority concerned. A copy of the inquiry report was sent to the p