( 1 ) IN the suit seeking decree of declarations [ (i) that the collaboration agreement dated 23. 4. 87 stands cancelled and is inoperative and not binding on the plaintiff and that the plaintiff has, therefore, no obligations thereunder to the defendants and that the defendants have no light subsisting thereunder or arising out of that agreement, (ii) that the various agreements to sell used by defendants 1 and 2 for the purposes of entering into further contracts with third parties including defendants 5 to 13 and on which the plaintiff s signatures were obtained as a confirming party are vitiated, inoperative and void and that the plaintiff is not bound by the terms of any of these agreements used by defendants 1 and 2, (iii) that the documents being agreements to sell executed by the plaintiff in blank on 28. 8. 89 and which have been used for purpose- of signing a contract for sale of flats B-2 and E-1 to defendants 1 and 3 respectively are duly cancelled and are vitiated by fraud and mis-representations and are void and as such not binding on the plaintiff and creates no rights in favour of defendants 1 and 3, (iv) that the plaintiff has a right to immediately