Devinder Gupta, J.

( 1 ) RULE DB

( 2 ) WITH consent of the parties we propose to dispose of the petition today.

( 3 ) HAVING heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the respective stand taken on behalf of respondents 1 to 3 and respondent No. 4 in their respective counter affidavits, we are of the view that the petition deserves to be allowed and the reliefs prayed for in the petition deserve to be granted.

( 4 ) THE petitioner having completed his post- graduation in Sanskrit from Delhi University in the year 1974 consequent upon an interview for the post of Trained Graduate Teacher (Sanskrit) he was appointed on 28. 9. 1974 as a Trained Graduate Teacher (Language) in respondent No. 4 school on probation for a period of one year as per the appointment letter, annexure P-4. On completion of the period of probation his services were confirmed with effect from 16. 9. 1974 through letter annexure P-5. In the month of June, 1986 the post of Post Graduate Teacher (Sanskrit) fell vacant in the school on the retirement of S. N. Shastri. Petitioner, who though appointed as Trained Graduate Teacher (Language) had been teaching Sanskrit continuously from the date of his appoint

Click Here to Read the rest of this document