SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 318

ARUN KUMAR
CREDIT CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
FOREMOST INDUSTRIES LTD. – Respondent


ARUN KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) I. A. No. 4708 of 1994. The plaintiff has filed a petition under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act praying that the agreement between the parties which contains an arbitration clause be filed in court and for appointment of an arbitrator in accordance with the arbitration clause contained in the agreement. Along with the main petition under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, the plaintiff filed an application under Order 40, Rule 1 of the same Act for appointment of a Receiver with respect to the leased equipment. On the said application, this court had appointed a Receiver to take possession of the leased equipment. In the meantime the present application has been filed under Sections 442 and 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 praying that proceedings pending in this court are liable to be stayed until the plaintiff seeks permission or leave of the Company Court which has allegedly passed the winding up order with respect to the defendant Company. The learned counsel for the plaintiff has chosen not to file a reply to the application and has argued for dismissal of the application orally.

( 2 ) NO doubt provisions of Section 446 of the Companies Act envisages that




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top