SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 378

LOKESHWAR PRASAD
DELHI SECURITY PRINTERS – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTAN ENGINEERING AND GENERAL MAZDOOR UNION (REGD. ) – Respondent


Lokeshwar Prasad, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff, named above, has filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendant. The case of the plaintiff, in brief, is that the plaintiff is a partnership firm, duly registered with the Registrar of Firms Shri Anuj Khurana is one of the partners of the plaintiff firm who is fully conversant with the facts of the case and competent to sign and verify the plaint and institute the suit on behalf of the plaintiff. The plaintiff, as per the averment made in the plaint, carries on the business of manufacture and trading of paper, stationery, printing, general order suppliers, loose leaf binders and allied stationery which is mainly used in banks for maintenance of accounts and records, printing of lottery tickets and bus tickets at Premises H-56, Udyog Nagar Industrial Area, Opposite Peerangarhi, Delhi and 31-B, Prahlad Market, Karol Bagh, New Delhi.

1. 1 It is alleged that defendant No. 2 is an employee of the plaintiff. The plaintiff posted defendant No. 2 to Purmanu (Himachal Pradesh) temporarily for a period of 7 to 10 days and informed defendant No. 2 about the same vide letter dated the 28th July, 1995. However, defendant No. 2 refused to co








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top