SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 427

R.C.LAHOTI, S.N.KAPUR
UTTAM CHAND (DECEASED) THROUGH PHOOL KUMARI – Appellant
Versus
CANARA BANK PAHARGANJ, NEW DELHI – Respondent


R. C. Lahoti, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal preferred by Smt. Phool Kumari, widow of one late Uttam Chand Jain, who was sole defendant in a civil suit.

( 2 ) ON the death of defendant, the counsel appearing for him informed the Court of factum of death as contemplated by Order 22 Rule 10-A CPC. On 18. 10. 95 it was brought to the notice of the Court by the counsel for the plaintiff that Mr. J. K. Jain, counsel appearing for the deceased defendant was also related to him. On a prayer made by the counsel for the plaintiff, the counsel for the defendant Mr. J. K. Jain was directed to disclose the names of the LRs of the deceased-defendant, so as to enable the plaintiff filing an appropriate application bringing the LRs on record.

( 3 ) AS Mr. J. K. Jain, counsel for the defendant did not comply with the order, on 17. 9. 96, the learned Single Judge has once again directed him to comply with the previous order within four weeks.

( 4 ) AGGRIEVED by the abovesaid orders, this appeal has been filed.

( 5 ) IT is submitted by the appellant that duly of the counsel contemplated by Rule 10-A of Order 22 of the Civil Procedure Code is over by bringing the factum of death of the party to the notic















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top