SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 953

MOHD.SHAMIM
MAYA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Mohd. Sharnim, J.-

( 1 ) THE petitioner has brought forward the present petition for issue of a direction against the respondent No. 3, their servants and agents restraining them from carrying out illegal construction of flats in the area marked A in between Pocket A-11 and A-14 at Kalkaji Extension, New Delhi which is a site reserved for a primary school in the lay out plan and for restoration of the said area for the purposes of a primary school and to construct a school thereon.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts which gave rise to the present petition are as under : that the petitioner is a mother of four daughters. Out of them, namely, Priyanka and Garima are 11 and 9 years of age respectively and are students of a primary school. The petitioner is also a member of the Park Committee of Kalkaji Extension. The petitioner is a resident of Kalkaji Extension area. The population of the area is approximately 1. 6 lacs, yet with no Government primary school. Conseqeuntly the children of the said area have to travel long distances for their primary education.

( 3 ) RESPONDENT No. 3 i. e. the Delhi Development Authority was constituted by an Act of Parliament. Section 7 of the Delhi Development Act (















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top