SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 918

DEBOPAM BHOWMICK – Appellant
Versus
ALPANA BHOWMICK – Respondent


Usha Mehra, J.

( 1 ) $the petitioner husband sought divorce against the respondent wife on the ground of cruelty and desertion. The respondent wife moved an application in that petition under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter called the Act ). That application was dismissed because the learned Court came to the conclusion that wife has independent source of income. Hence not entitled to any maintenance. The revision filed against that order was also dismissed. However, in the review application filed by the wife, the learned Additional District Judge granted her litigation expenses.

( 2 ) THEREAFTER the respondent wife due to illness was admitted in the Moolchand Khairati Ram Hospital. She submitted the medical bill for reimbursement to the employer of the petitioner. The employer of the husband had issued letter to the said hospital that medical bill be submitted directly to it for reimbursement. However, subsequently when the bill was not directly paid by the employer of the husband the wife made the payment and claimed reimbursement from husband s employer. It is this claim of medical reimbursement which has been objected by the petitioner, inter alia, on the gro










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top