SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 794

B.K.RAMAMOORTHY
LIBERTY SALES SERVICE – Appellant
Versus
JAKKI MULL AND SONS AND SHANTI NATH JAIN – Respondent


K. Ramamoorthy, J.

( 1 ) THERE is suit No. 885/94 filed by Liberty Sales Service under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act,1940. The Liberty Sales Service filed a suit 264/94 in the lower court. That is withdrawn to this Court. and that is renumbered as suit No. 997/96. There was interim order passed by the lower court and against that order there was an appeal to the Senior Sub Judge in MCA. 1129/94 and that appeal was also withdrawn to this Court and that is renumbered as FAO. 231/96.

( 2 ) I shall fcollow the rank of the parties in suit No. 885/94 in this Court. Liberty Sales Service shall be hereinafter called the plaintiff and Jakki Mull and Sons shall be hereinafter referred to as the defendant.

( 3 ) WITH reference to a shop No. E-27, Connaught Place, New Delhi there was an agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant on 5. 1. 1991 in and by which the parties agreed to have share in the business carried on therein by selling of shoes. What is the nature of the agreement and what are the rights that flow from the reement are the points to be decided in this case.

( 4 ) ACCORDING to the defendant, the goods belonging to the plaintiff shall be sold by the defendant on commis












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top