SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 855

K.MEHRA
HARI RAM – Appellant
Versus
RUKMANI DEVI – Respondent


J. K. Mehra, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the order dated 16. 7. 1979 passed by the Rent Control Tribunal, Delhi dismissing the appeal of the appellant and affirming the eviction order passed by the Additional Rent Controller, inter-alia, under clause (b) of the Proviso to Section 14 (1) of Delhi Rent Control Act and under clause (j) of Proviso to Section 14 (1) further granting one month s time to the appellant to restore the premises to its original condition and repair the damage caused to the premises and further directing that if the damage is not repaired and the premises are not restored to its original condition within the time granted, the eviction order would be deemed to have been passed on the ground covered by clause (j) of the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act as well. As regards ground under clause (a) of the said proviso, the Trial Court had passed the requisition order for the deposit of arrears of rent from 6. 3. 1973 to 5. 7. 1973 and had granted benefit of Section 14 (2) subject to the tenant depositing the arrears of rent within time allowed by the Additional Rent Controller.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to the filing o



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top