SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 838

MOHD.SHAMIM
TEJPAL SHASTRI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


( 1 ) CW No. 39/7 and CMNo. 6937 of 96 The petitioner through the present writ petition want a direction from this Court to restrain the respondents from taking forcible possession of the land and structures raised thereon, belonging to the petitionssituated at K Block. Mahipalpur Extension, Part I, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the property in dispute ).

( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners has contended that. the petitioners are the lawful occupants of the property in dispute since long. They have been provided with all the essential facilities by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi such as water connections, electric connections and telephone connections They have been issued ration cards. The above said colony where the petitioners are residing is proposed to be legalised and regularised. The respondents are threatening to dispossess the petitioner from the abovesaid properties. Hence the petitioners were compelled and impelled to bring forward the present suit.

( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the respondents have urged to the contrary.

( 4 ) I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at sufficient length and have very carefully examined their rival contentions and













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top