MOHD.SHAMIM
TEJPAL SHASTRI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners has contended that. the petitioners are the lawful occupants of the property in dispute since long. They have been provided with all the essential facilities by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi such as water connections, electric connections and telephone connections They have been issued ration cards. The above said colony where the petitioners are residing is proposed to be legalised and regularised. The respondents are threatening to dispossess the petitioner from the abovesaid properties. Hence the petitioners were compelled and impelled to bring forward the present suit.
( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the respondents have urged to the contrary.
( 4 ) I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at sufficient length and have very carefully examined their rival contentions and
Mahadeo Savlaram Shelke and Ors. Vs. Puna Municipal Corporation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.