SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 82

R.C.LAHOTI
VRAJLAL MANILAL AND COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
ADARSH BIDI COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L.AGRAWAL, M.L.Lonial, R.K.AGARWAL

R. C. Lahoti

( 1 ) THE plaintiffs who are registered owners of the trade mark 22 for manufacturing and- marketing bidis have filed this suit complaining of infringement and passing off of their trade mark 22 , also complaining of infringement of their copyright in respect of their label.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the plaintiffs they have been carrying on manufacturing and marketing of bidis for more than 5 decades. Their trade mark is "22". The trade mark labels comprising of numerals 22 have been duly registered and renewed from time to time. They have been valid on the date of the suit. The label consisting of "22" is an artistic work duly registered under the. Copyrights Act. The plaintiffs are having substantial sales and have incurred huge amounts in publicity of their trade mark and label. The plaintiffs have branch officers in Delhi, Agra and Lucknow and Head Office in Sagar. The plaintiffs are one of the oldest and leading manufacturers of Bidis of superior quality. Shortly before the institution of the suit, the plaintiffs have noticed the defendants manufacturing and selling their bidis under the Trade Mark 122, also having slavishly copied the plaintiffs label.

( 3 ) THE pl










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top