SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 27

ARUN KUMAR
SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
VARSHAWATI SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.S.BHALLA, G.N.AGGARWAL

Arun Kumar

( 1 ) THE petitioner filed a petition under section 14 (l) (e) read with section 25 B of the Delhi Rent Control Act for eviction of the respondents. Mr. Jagan Nath Sharma was the original tenant with respect to the premises in dispute. According to the petitioner the tenancy of Jagan Nath Sharma was terminated vide notice dated 5. 3. 1984. Jagan Nath Sharma died on 16. 8. 1985. The present petition was filed in March 1988. At the outset it was pointed out by the counsel for the respondents that Dharam Dev @ Pappi, respondent No. 3 in the petition died about three months back. It is not disputed that. the said Dharam Dev died unmarried and did not leave behind any heir of his own. In these circumstances the learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement at the Bar giving up the said respondent.

( 2 ) THE learned Additional Rent Controller dismissed the petition vide impugned judgment dated 30. 10. 92 holding that the tenancy of deceased Jagan Nath Sharma had not been terminated during his life time and, therefore, all the heirs of deceased Jagan Nath Sharma should have been impleaded as respondents. It was further observed in the impugned judgment that "it is incumben







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top