K.S.BHATT
CHHOTE LAL – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioners were appointed as Researchassociates in terms of a scheme formulated by Indian Council of Agriculturalresearch. The scheme is REFERRED TO as general Guidelines for the formulation,processing, scrutiny, sanction, implementation and evaluation of research schemesto be financed by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research from its agriculturalproduce cess funds. Para 16 of this scheme states that "a Research Associate shallbe selected by a Selection Committee to be constituted by the Principal Investigatoror the University/institution in accordance with Rules in existence there, or by themanagement Committee in case of ICAR institute. The appointment will not be aregular employment, but restricted in the duration of the project/scheme".
( 2 ). Initially the petitioners were appointed somewhere in the year 1986 and1987. There were similar other appointees as well at different places. When therewas a proposal or actual action terminating the services of these Research Associates writ petitions were filed in Allahabad High Court and ultimately the mattercame up before the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 9865-1971 /
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.