SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 74

K.S.BHATT
CHHOTE LAL – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.B.Joshi, SUNITA BHARDVAJ, Umesh Sharma

Mr. K. Shivashankar Bhat, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners were appointed as Researchassociates in terms of a scheme formulated by Indian Council of Agriculturalresearch. The scheme is REFERRED TO as general Guidelines for the formulation,processing, scrutiny, sanction, implementation and evaluation of research schemesto be financed by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research from its agriculturalproduce cess funds. Para 16 of this scheme states that "a Research Associate shallbe selected by a Selection Committee to be constituted by the Principal Investigatoror the University/institution in accordance with Rules in existence there, or by themanagement Committee in case of ICAR institute. The appointment will not be aregular employment, but restricted in the duration of the project/scheme".

( 2 ). Initially the petitioners were appointed somewhere in the year 1986 and1987. There were similar other appointees as well at different places. When therewas a proposal or actual action terminating the services of these Research Associates writ petitions were filed in Allahabad High Court and ultimately the mattercame up before the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 9865-1971 /


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top