SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 160

JASPAL SINGH
PUNJAB AND SINDH BANK – Appellant
Versus
LABH SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT SINGH, K.C.DUA

Jaspal Singh

( 1 ) HISTORY of this case starts from June 21, 1994 when defendant No. I took a loan of Rs. 56,000. 00 for purchase of a truck against its security and hypothecation and on surety and guarantee of defendant No. 2. Whereas defendant No. I executed the agreement of hypothecation. Demand Promissory Note besides other documents undertaking thereby to pay the loan amount on demand together with interest, defendant No. 2 executed letter of guarantee standing surety and guarantor for the refund of the loan amount and interest thereon at the agreed rate. The grievance of the plaintiff Bank is that defendant No. l made only two payments one of Rs. 2,200. 00 ondecember 17, 1974 and the second of Rs. 2,500. 00 on July 1, 1976 and thus committed default in payment of the amount of the Demand Promissory Note, interest and other charges. Hence this suit for the recovery of Rs. l,09,991. 50p. inclusive of interest.

( 2 ) DEFENDANT No. 2 was proceeded against ex-parte.

( 3 ) DEFENDANT No. 1 has contested the suit.

( 4 ) THOUGH the pleadings of the parties led to the framing of as many as nine issues, at the time of arguments the suit was contested only on the plea that at the time of












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top