SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 235

A.D.SINGH
SUBASH CHANDER – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.S.SAINI, N.L.BAREJA

Anil Dev Singh, J.

( 1 ). WHILE addressing the arguments on the application CM 3400 of 1994 the learned counsel for the parties covered the entire gamut of controversy raised in the writ petition. Learned counsel for the parties agreed that the writ petition be disposed of instead of merely disposing of the application. Accordingly I proceed to dispose of the writ petition.

( 2 ). THE petitioner was enrolled as a sepoy in the army on March 19,1982. At the time of his entry in the army no note of any disease was made, though his medical examination was conducted. It is stated in the petition that the petitioner performed his duties as per the following details:

1)MARCH 1982 to February 1983 - He succesfully completed the basic training and was posted to 10 Grenadiers. During this period he took active part in Athletics. 2)In February 1983 the petitioner joined his unit at Hyderabad and from February 1983 to May 1983 he took active part in sports. He secured first position in cross country running in a competition held at Brigade level. 3)From May 1983 to some part of the year 1986 the petitioner s unit moved to Jammu and Kashmir and he performed his duties under difficult climatic co


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top