SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 346

M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
PREM PRAKASH ALIAS PREM – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dhanbir Singh, P.K.SHARMA

( 1 ) THESE appeals are directed against the judgment dated 31-8-1976 passed by the Additional Session Judge, Delhi whereby the appellants were convicted under Section 307/34 I. P. C. and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for four years each together with a fine of Rs. 200/- each or in default of payment of fine to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for four months. These appeals shall be disposed off by the common judgment.

( 2 ) THE incident giving rise to the present appeals took place on 7-9-75. It appears that the complainant Anil Kumar (P. W. 5) and appellants were in love with Ms. Uttam (P. W. 6 ). Since Ms. Uttam (P. W. 6) used to remain in the company of Anil Kumar (P. W. 5), the appellant felt ill about it. According to the prosecution, on 7-9-75 at about 8 p. m. , while Anil Kumar (P. W. 5) and Ms. Uttam (P. W. 6) were proceeding towards Dina Ka Talab, the appellants came from behind. Appellants Amir Chand and Prem Prakash secured Anil Kumar and dragged him in a nearby lane. Appellant Ved Prakash followed them. Thereafter, the appellant Ved Prakash took out a knife and inflicted two blows with it as a result whereof Anil Kumar sustained one injury on the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top