SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 310

N.G.NANDI
LOK KALYAN SAMITI – Appellant
Versus
JAGDISH PRAKASH SAINI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMAN VACHHER, O.C.JAIN, P.N.LEKHI, P.S.KHERA

N. G. Nandi, J.

( 1 ). BY this application, the plaintiff seeks to amend the suit valuation for the purpose of court fees and jurisdiction to Rs. 5,05,000. 00 and also prays to amend the plaint to make up the deficiency/difference in the court fees already paid and now become payable on revaluation.

( 2 ). THE suit as framed is value at Rs. 1,05,000. 00 for the purpose of court fees and jurisdiction.

( 3 ). THAT the amendment Act raising the pecuninary jurisdiction of the District Court on its Original Side to Rs. 5,00,000. 00 being 4 of Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 1991 came to be passed and pursuant to the notification by the High Court on its administrative side, under the Amendment Act of 1991 suits below the valuation of Rs. 5,00,000. 00 except certain categories of matters excluded from the purview of the said notification, came to be transferred.

( 4 ). AFTER the passing of the aforesaid notification by this High Court on its administrative side, the present suit became liable to be transferred to the District Court, Delhi. At that juncture the present amendment application under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure came to be filed by the plaintiff seeking t





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top