D.K.JAIN, Y.K.SABHARWAL
HARMIT SINGH GHAI – Appellant
Versus
ANAND S. KHULLAR DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (RECOVERY)SALES TAX – Respondent
( 1 ) THE issue arising for consideration in this batch of writ pelitions relates to the validity of the action already taken or proposed to be taken by the Sales Tax Authorities against the petitioners for effecting recovery of arrears of Sales Tax and Central Sales Tax payable by then under the Delhi Sales Tax Act 1975, (for short the Local Act) and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (for short the Cen tral Act) by taking recourse to arrest and detention in Civii prison of the petitioners as provided under the provisions of Sections 136 and 138 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 (for short the Land Reforms Act) and the rules made thereunder.
( 2 ) APART from the question of property and validity of the action taken by the respondents in the case of each of the petitioners, which we shall deal separately, the short but the prime common question requiring consideration is whether a person is liable to be arrested and detained for a total period of 15 days, prescribed in Section 138 of the Land Reforms Act in relation to the demand in a recovery certificate, being the total demand created on account of various assessments separately made or can such a person be detained sepe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.