SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 530

MOHD.SHAMIM
SATYA NARAIN AGGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
KAMLESH KUMARI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GITA MITTAL, O.P.Sharma

MOHD. SHAMIM

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against an order dated September 29,1993 passed by the learned Sub Judge whereby he rejected an application under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure moved by the plaintiff/petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner for the sake of convenience ). The petitioner through the proposed amenment wanted to plead that the defendant/respondent ( hereinafter referred to as the respondent for the sake of brevity) has got no right to block the passage. He further wanted to explain through the amendment sought that he has got an un-interrupted right by way of easement to the light, Sun and the air. In case the respondent succeeds in raising the construction then he would be deprived of the light, Sun and the air. The petitioner further wanted to allege that the proposed construction is in violation of the bye-laws of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi.

( 2 ) THE respondent opposed the said application on the ground that the petitionerthrough the proposed amendments wanted to introduce a new case and wanted to raise new pleas which were contradictory to and inconsistent with the pleas already raised by him. It has furth












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top