SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 491

D.P.WADHWA, M.K.SHARMA
UNIBROS – Appellant
Versus
ALL INDIA RADIO – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARVIND SHARMA, Gajendra Kumar, K.T.S.Tulsi, MIRA BHATIA, MUKUL ROHTAGI, R.L.PAL

M. K. Sharma

( 1 ) THE petitioners have preferred this writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus for setting aside/quashing the award of contract on 28. 3. 1995 itself to respondent No. 4 for the construction of Doordarshan Bhawan, Mandi House, Phase II, New Delhi, with a further direction to the respondents to award the work/contract relating to construction of Doordarshan Bhawan, Mandi House, Phase II, New Delhi (Superstructure) to the petitioners. In the writ petition the following prayers have been made by the petitioners:-

1. This Hon ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a writ/order or dircclion in the nature of certiorari/mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction selling aside/quashing the decision of considering again on 28. 3. 1995 at 4 P. m. the tender for construction of Doordarshan Bhawan - Mandi House, Phase II, New Delhi and quash award of contract on 28. 3. 1995 itself to respondent No. 4.

2. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to award the work/contract relating to "construction of Doordarshan Bhawan, Mandi House, Phase 11, New Delhi - Super structure to the petitioners".

3. Issue appropriate writ/direction restraining the respondents from





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top