SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 503

MOHD.SHAMIM
MAHINDER AHUJA – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jasprit Sarin, Mala Goel, Maninder Kaur, Ravinder Sethi, S.C.Juneja

Mohd. Sharnim

( 1 ) THE petitioner through the present revision petition has taken exception to an order dated March 4,1993 passed by Sub Judge, Delhi whereby he dismissed an application under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure moved by one Mahinder Ahuja ( hereinafter REFERRED TO as the petitioner) for his impleadment as one of the parties in Suit No. 19/89, Smt. Makhani Devi Juneja vs. Delhi Development Authority.

( 2 ) IT has been urged for and on behalf of the petitioner that Smt. Makhani Devi and Shri Vilayat Juneja ( hereinafter REFERRED TO. as respondents Nos. 2 and 3 ) filed a suit against Delhi Development Authority i. e. Suit No. 19/89, for a declaration and permanent injunction. They through the said suit prayed for a restraint order against the DDA not to give effect to the cancellation order dated January 2,1989 whereby the allotment order dated July 1,1975 was cancelled in respect of Stall No. 22, C-4e, Janakpuri, New Delhi ( hereinafter REFERRED TO as the disputed shop ). The petitioner through the present application wants his impleadment in the above suit on the ground that respondents Nos. 2 and 3 have sold a part of the abovesaid disputed shop in favou






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top