SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 672

LOKESHWAR PRASAD, R.C.LAHOTI
GOPAL BHAGAT – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K.SHARMA, D.S.Dhahiya

R. C. Lahoti

( 1 ) THE petitioner, a Medical Officer, serving with the Municipal Corporation of Delhi was posted at Primary Health Centre, Mehrauli. It appears that some complaint against him was made with the Vigilance Deptt. alleging that the petitioner had admitted indoors Dr. Arvind Kumar Sharma on 1. 6. 95 though there was no reason why he should have been so admitted. The complaint having been investigated into, the report was placed before the Commissioner. Pursuant to his order dated 21. 6. 95, the petitioner has been issued with recordable warning dated 26. 6. 95 (Annexure-III ).

( 2 ) THE petitioner apprehended his transfer consenquent to the abovesaid proceedings. On 31. 7. 95, the petitioner filed the present petition seeking two reliefs : (i) a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to withdraw the recordable warning dated 26. 6. 95 (communicated on 6. 7. 95); (ii) and to pass further direction/order to the respondent No. 1 not to harass/punish the petitioner in relation to the warning dated 26. 6. 95 (communicated on 6. 7. 95 ).

( 3 ) THE petition was accompanied by an application seeking an ad-interim writ restraining the respondents from disturbing the petitioner































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top