SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 571

S.K.MAHAJAN
RADHE KRISHAN AGGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRAWATI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.GUPTA, R.M.Bagai

S. K. Mahajan

( 1 ) THIS order will dispose of the application of the plaintiff for interim injunction for restraining the defendants from in any manner transferring, disposing or alientating the suit property. Facts of the case is short are that the plaintiff is seeking specific performance of the contract dated 30th June, 1993 alleged to have been executed in his favour by the defendants for sale of the factory premises constructed on 400 sq. yards in Khatoni No. 66, Khasra No. 28 /10/ 3 in the extended lal dora of village Barwala, Delhi - 110 039. Injunction has also been sought restraining the defendants from transferring or alienating the said factory premises. The case as set up in the plaint is that M/s. Delhi Wire Industries, which was a partnership-firm, were tenants in respect of the aforesaid factory premises at a rent of Rs. 850. 00 p. m. under defendant No. 1. Defendant No. 2 is the husband of defendant No. 1 and is also stated to be her general attorney. As attorney of defendant No. 1, the said defendant No. 2 had been conducting litigation on her behalf and had been appearing in various Courts from time to time. In a suit bearing No. 84/91 entitled Smt. Chandrawati v.







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top