SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 711

A.D.SINGH, M.JAGANNADHA RAO
SARALA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
DAYA RAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.V.Khatri, SANDiP SETHI

Anil Dev Singh, J.

( 1 )

( 2 ) THIS is an appeal from the order of the learned single Judge in I. A. 9565/94 in Suit No. 1518/94 whereby the suit filed under Order 37 Civil Procedure Code has been treated as an ordinary regular suit. The facts giving rise to this appeal are as under:-

( 3 ) THE first appellant herein is the first plaintiff while the second and third appellants herein are the second and third plaintiffs in the suit. The first appellant is the widow and the second and third appellants are the son and daughter respectively of late Brahm Parkash, who died on July 6, 1990. The first two respondents in this appeal are the first two defendants in the suit. The third and fourth respondents,the legal representatives of late Tej Ram, are the third and fourth defendants in the suit.

( 4 ) ON April 2, 1990 Brahm Parkash entered into an agreement with the first and second respondents and Tej Ram. Under the agreement, the first and second respondents and Tej Ram agreed to sell a piece of land measuring 17 bighas and 4 biswas comprised in Khasra No. 43/12 (4-16), 13/1 (3-12), 17 (4-8) and 18 (4-8) situate in village Kakrola, New Delhi to Brahm Parkash at the rate of Rs. 6. 25 lakh




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top