SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 695

S.D.PANDIT
SHAMBU P. JAISINGHANI – Appellant
Versus
KANAYALAL P. JAISINGHANI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashok Gumani

S. D. Pandit

( 1 ) SHAMBU P. Jaisinghani has filed this petition to obtain probate as regards the Will executed on 1. 9. 1960 by his mother Smt. Puribai, widow of Late Shri Prem Chand Jaisinghani.

( 2 ) PETITIONER Shambu P. Jaisinghani and respondents 1 and 2, viz. Kanayalal P. Jnghani and Nanikram P. Jaisinghani are real brothers and sons of late Puribai widow of Late Shri Prem Chand Jaisinghani. In the year 1960 she was residing at Bhusawal with her son defendant no. 1 and she was owning properties in Delhi and Udaipur.

( 3 ) BY her Will dated 1. 9. 1960 she bequeathed the property bearing Block No. 28, House No. l75, Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi, in favour of her son Kanayalal P. Jaisinghani, respondent No. 1, whereas House No. 1oo-C. Prasad Nagar, Udaipur is bequeathed by her in favour of the petitioner Shambu P. Jaisinghani. It was the last Will of Late Smt. Puribai and the same was registered in the office of the Sub-Registrar, Bhusawal, District Jalgaon, Maharashtra.

( 4 ) IT is the further claim of the petitioner that no probate or letters of administration in respect of the said Will were ever applied for and issued by any Court. The original Will was left in custody of his elde









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top