SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 766

N.G.NANDI
P. M. DIESELS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
PATEL FIELD MARSHAL INDUSTRIES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MANMOHAN SINGH, R.K.AGARWAL, V.K.Makhija

N. G. Nandi, J.

( 1 ) IN the suit for perpetual injunction, seeking to restrain the defendant from using the trading style to read as PATEL FIELD MARSHAL AGENCIES as well as PATEL FIELD MARSHAL INDUSTRIES containing the whole trade mark FIELD MARSHAL of the plaintiff for marketing their goods of the same kind and description as those of the plaintiffs and for rendition of accounts of profit earned by the defendants, the plaintiff by this IA seeks to restrain the defendant from using logo PFMA and PFMI which may be identical and/or deceptively similar to the registered trade mark of the plaintiff and from using and/or trading under the name and style to read as "patel FIELD MARSHAL AGENCIES" and "patel FIELD MARSHAL INDUSTRIES" pending hearing and disposal of the suit.

( 2 ) BY order dated 30. 6. 1989, the defendants have been restrained from adopting the plaintiff s registered trade mark "field MARSHAL" as the trading mark for their proposed company. The defendant filed rely t6 the IA and resisted the claim of the plaintiff for the grant of ad interim injunction.

( 3 ) I would like to deal with two submissions advanced by the defendant, the acceptance, if any, of any one, pale the






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top