SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 781

S.K.MAHAJAN
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Singla, KUM KUM SEN, S.GHOSH, Sanjay Dhar

S. K. Mahajan,j.

( 1 ) THIS order will dispose of the application underorder6 Rule 17 Civil Procedure Code for amendment of the written statement filed by the defendant. Thefacts of the case in short are that the plaintiff had made a term deposit in the totalsum of-Rs. 6,00,000. 00 with defendant No. l and three term deposit receipts each forthe value of Rs. 2,00,000. 00 were issued by the defendant-Bank. The said receipts became due for payment on 8/12/1984. When theplaintiff on maturity of the said receipts went to the office of the defendant on 10thdecember, 1984, he was informed that payment cannot be made to the plaintiff onaccount of certain instructions received from the head office/regional office. Theplaintiff, therefore, filed the present suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civilprocedure for the grant of a decree for Rs. 6,27,270. 00. Leave to defend the suit wasgranted to the defendants by order dated 15/01/1987 and the defendantsfiled the written statement. The case as set up in the written statement by thedefendants was that the plaintiff alongwith Mr. Rajender Bhanot, Managing Director of M/s. Indo Travels Services Private Limited approached the defendant-Bankwith a r


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top