S.K.MAHAJAN
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS order will dispose of the application underorder6 Rule 17 Civil Procedure Code for amendment of the written statement filed by the defendant. Thefacts of the case in short are that the plaintiff had made a term deposit in the totalsum of-Rs. 6,00,000. 00 with defendant No. l and three term deposit receipts each forthe value of Rs. 2,00,000. 00 were issued by the defendant-Bank. The said receipts became due for payment on 8/12/1984. When theplaintiff on maturity of the said receipts went to the office of the defendant on 10thdecember, 1984, he was informed that payment cannot be made to the plaintiff onaccount of certain instructions received from the head office/regional office. Theplaintiff, therefore, filed the present suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civilprocedure for the grant of a decree for Rs. 6,27,270. 00. Leave to defend the suit wasgranted to the defendants by order dated 15/01/1987 and the defendantsfiled the written statement. The case as set up in the written statement by thedefendants was that the plaintiff alongwith Mr. Rajender Bhanot, Managing Director of M/s. Indo Travels Services Private Limited approached the defendant-Bankwith a r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.