SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 778

DEVENDER GUPTA
CHIRONJI LAL GARG – Appellant
Versus
MOHAN SINGH CHOPRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.MOHAN, D.S.Narula, P.L.BANSAL, RAJENDRA PRASAD AGRAWAL

Devinder Gupta, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiffs in a suit for specific performance of agreement to sell dated 4th October, 1993 have in this application filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure prayed for an order of injunction restraining defendants 1 and 2 from entering into agreement of sale, parting with possession or creating third party interest in respect of property No . B-7/5, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi. In addition, the plaintiffs had also prayed for restraining defendant No. 3 from selling by way of auction or otherwise the said property for recovery of the amount due from defendant No. l.

( 2 ) AN ad interim ex parte order of injunction, as prayed, was granted on 14th March, 1995 against defendants I and 2. In so far as defendant No. 3 is concerned, the order, as prayed, was passed subject to plaintiffs depositing a sum of Rs. 50,00,000. 00 in the Registry of this Court by 20th March, 1995.

( 3 ) THAT on 31st July, 1995, it was stated at the bar that plaintiff had not deposited the said amount of Rs. 50,00,000. 00 as per order dated 14th March, 1995. It was observed that since the amount had not been deposited, the order passed on 14th March, 1995 a



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top