SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 832

S.D.PANDIT
PARAMJIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SOHAN SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
NANDINI SAHNI

S. D. Pandit

( 1 ) THIS application is filed by the plaintiff Paramjit Singh under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is alleged by the plaintiff/ applicant in this application that defendants 1 to 4 are getting income of more than Rs. 25,000. 00 and that he has got 40 per cent share in the same. He has further alleged that he has suffered in 1984 riots and his house and factory has been listed and he is residing at Ludhiana alongwith his wife and two school going children and he cannot work at Ludhiana due to various Court matters at Delhi. Thus, he is finding it difficult to maintain himself and his family. Therefore, he may be provided maintenance at the rate of Rs. 5,000. 00 per month to support his wife and two school going children, as per the Supreme Court order dated 21. 8. 199.

( 2 ) THE claim of the plaintiff is resisted by defendants 1 to 4 by filing the reply. They have contended that the plaintiff had suppressed material facts from the Supreme Court in his Special Leave Petition , in which the order on which he is relying has been passed. They contend that the plaintiff is running a factory at Ludhiana and has sufficient income to maintain himself and his fa




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top