SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 835

ARUN KUMAR
JAGDISH CHANDER GULATI – Appellant
Versus
KANTA DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.S.Dalal, Keshav Dayal, R.L.Kohli

Arun Kumar, J.

( 1 ) THIS is tenant s revision petition under section 25 B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the judgment of the Additional Controller, Delhi dated 5th September 1991 whereby the Additional Controller passed an eviction order in favour of the respondent landlady regarding the suit premises under clause (e) of the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Act. By the impugned judgment the Addl. Controller disposed of two eviction petitions. Two petitions were filed by the respondent landlady because there were two tenancies with respect to two portions of the same property bearing No. E-357, Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi. The petitioner tenant is common in both the cases. One petition was regarding a room on the ground floor (backside) of the property while the other petition was filed with respect to accommodation comprising of barsati (second floor) having one big room, kitchen, latrine and bath and a small store.

( 2 ) THE case of the respondent landlady in the eviction petitions was that she is the owner and landlady of the suit premises. The premises was let out for residential purpose only by the previous owner












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top