( 1 ) THE petitioner got himself registered for allotment of a flat of MIG category under Registration Scheme of New Pattern, 1979. This was on 1. 8. 79. In 1991, the petitioner was allotted aflat Several writ petitions were filed challenging the costing pattern adopted by the DDA. There were two rounds of writ petitions. Ultimately, all these petitions were; dismissed consequent loan order passed by a Full Bench in Sheelawanti s case AIR 1995 DELHI 212. The allottees of the flats were allowed time for payment of the price. Instead of making the payment now the present petition has been filed submitting that basic amenities/facilities such as water, electricity and sewerage are not yet available in the area and as the respondent DDA would not be in aposition to deliver possession over the flats, the DDA be restrained from demanding the, amount from the petitioner and at the same time the allotment made to the petitioner be not cancelled.

( 2 ) WE are clearly of the opinion that the petitioner and others like him are unwilling buyers of the flats. We have asked the learned counsel for the petitioner to show us policy/decision of the DDA or terms of the allotment, or