( 1 ) M/s Bharat Electronics Ltd. is aggrieved by the impugned order passed by respondent No. l, the Appellate Authority as well as by Certifying Officer. By the impugned order they amended Clause 9. 1 and 14. 1 of the draft standing order submitted by the petitioner for certification.

( 2 ) VIDE Clause 9. 1, petitioner had proposed 18 days annual leave to its workmen. In clause 14. 1 it reserved the right to transfer the employees from one unit to another and from one State or town to another. Workmen did not agree to the proposal given in these two clauses and therefore, made representation before the Certifying Officer. The Appelalte Authority as well as the Certifying Officer keeping in view the annual leave granted by the Ghaziahad Unit of the Company amended Clause 9. 1 thereby certifying that 30 days annual leave be given to the workmen, by amending modifying Clause 14. 1 of the draft standing order they curtailed the powers of the Management, petitioner to effect transfer of its employees to other units of the company. This has been done on the presumption that Kotdwara unit of the Company and its employees had relationship of master and servant dehorse the c