SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Del) 7

V.B.BANSAL
POWER PERSONNEL TRAINERS ASSOCIATIONAND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.B.Sahni, K.A.DEVAN, M.A.SIDDIQUE, Madhusudan Sharma, MIRA BHATIA

Mr. V. B. Bansal, J.

( 1 ) IN this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitiones have made the following prayers:-

(A) Declare that the purported/impugned decision of the respondents I and 2 to absorb the respondent No. 3 as Chief Superintendent (Training) Rs. 5100-5700 on permanent basis to be illegal and void, and issue an appropriate writ order or direction quashing the same; (b) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction requiring the respondents 1 and 2 to take prompt steps as in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Power Engineers Training Society (Recruitment) Rules, 1980 as applicable/adopted by N. P. T. I. for filling the post of Chief Superintendent (Training) Rs. 5100-5700 by promotion from amongst the eligible incumbents; (e) issue rule in terms of prayers (a) and (b) above and make the same absolute after Notice to the respondents; (d) issue any other appropriate writ, order or direction as this Hon ble Court may. deem fit in the circumstanes of the case.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts leading to the filing of this writ petition are as under:-

( 3 ) THE petitioner No. 1 is an Associati















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top