( 1 ). Mr. K. G. Mal and Anr. , by this Revision petition, have assailed the order of learned Additional District Judge, Delhi, dated 3. 10. 92, whereby his application seeking amendment of the written statement was dismissed inter alia on the ground that beside being belated, if allowed it would amount to withdrawing the admission already made.

( 2 ). In short, the facts of the case are that Mr. Shyam Bihari Mal, respondent herein filed a suit claiming possession ofthe ground floor portion of property No. B-172, East of Kailash,new Delhi, against the present petitioners. In para 18 of fhe plaint the value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction was assessed at Rs. 75,000. 00. The petitioners (defendants before the trial court) filed a written statement. In reply to para 18 of the plaint it was stated that the said para being legal needs no reply. Subsequent to the filing ofthe said written statement, the defendants moved an application seeking amendment of the written statement. The said application was filed on 16th May,1986. The amendment was allowed. Against that order the present respondent came up in Revision. The said revision was ultimately d