SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Del) 75

A.D.SINGH
SUPER ENGINIRS – Appellant
Versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN JAITLEY, AYSHA KHATRI, B.B.GUPTA

Mr. Anil Dev Singh, J.

( 1 ) BY this writ petition the petitioners challenge the order of the respondent-New Delhi Municipal Committee dated July 14, 1992 whereby the respondent has imposed a ban on transacting any business with the second petitioner and the action of the respondent in not furnishing the tender documents to the first petitioner in respect of tenders floated on July 15, 1992 for the purchase of Low Tension Air Circuit Breaker panels.

( 2 ) THE first petitioner M/s. Super Engineering is a partnership firm and an authorised stockist of Low Tension Air Circuit Breaker (for short lt-ACB ) and other equipment manufactured by M/s. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. The second petitioner, a proprietary concern of the third petitioner, undertakes fabrication of electrical panel Boards and is claimed to be an associate of the first petitioner. The second petitioner had been dealing with the respondent in the past but a ban order dated July 14, 1992 was slapped by the respondent on the former, stopping all business with it. By a notice dated July 15, 1992 the respondent invited tenders for purchase of LT-ACB panels. The notice also laid down the eligibility criteria for participating in








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top