ARUN KUMAR, R.C.LAHOTI
TRINAGAR SHIKSHA PRACHARINI SABHA – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner has filed the present writ petitionchallenging the demand contained in the allotment-cum-demand letter dated 4/03/1993 issued by respondent No. 1. By the said letter he respondent hasallotted 1. 5 acres of land to the petitioner for purposes of a middle school at Rohini,delhi. Out of this allotment 75 acre of land is meant for school building for whichpetitioner has been called upon to pay premium @ 45 lac per acre while for thereemaining land meant for playground. The petitioner has to pay ground rent @ Rs. 5000. 00 per year.
( 2 ) THE petitioner is a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act,1860 with the object of imparting education. Towards this object the petitioner isrunning a School. The petitioner Society applied for allotment of Nazul land to thedirector of Education, Delhi, for construction of a new school building and aplayground for the students of the school. The application was made on 1 8/12/1986. Since allotment of Nazul land in Delhi rests with the Delhidevelopment Authority, the Director of Education sponsored the case of thepetitioner for allotment of land to the Delhi Development Authority vide its letterdated 5/02/1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.