SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Del) 206

C.M.NAYAR
MAHIPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.P.Ojha, V.K.Shali

C. M. Nayar, J.

( 1 ) THE present writ petition under Article 226 of theconstitution of India has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature ofmandamus and Certiorari for directing the respondents to take back the petitionerin service by declaring the Summary Court-martial proceedings and the resultantimpugned order dated 24/11/1988, by which the petitioner was sentencedlo be reduced in the ranks, to be dismissed from service and to suffer R. I. for sixmonths as-invalid and for quashing the same.

( 2 ) THE facts, briefly stated, are that the petitioner was enrolled on 28/02/1976 and was promoted to the rank of Havildar with effect from 1/01/1984. He was posted on transfer to the Zonal Recruiting Office (for short Z. R. O.) Jabalpuron 9/09/1984 and continued to serve there till 5/08/1987. He wasthereafter posted to No. 27 Air Defence Regiment (for short 27 A. D. Regiment ). Thepetitioner was called from 27 AD Regiment on alleged attachment to HQ. ,recruiting Zone, Jabalpur where he continued till the date he was removed fromthe Army by order dated 24/11/1988, as a result of conviction by thesummary Court-martial. On reaching Jabalpur he came to know that there weresome allegati




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top