( 1 ). Delhi Automobiles limited has filed this revision petition against the order dated 17/2/1993 of Shri S. M. Chopra, Additional Senior Sub-Judge, Delhi, dismissing the appeal of the petitioner and confirming C. R. 201 /93 the order dated 1/12/1992 of Shri K. S. Pal, Sub-Judge, 1st Class, Delhi, vide which an application underorder 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151, CPC, moved by the defendant/ petitioner was dismissed while the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, moved by the plaintiff/ respondent was. allowed and the petitioner was restrained from dispossessing the respondent/petitioner forcibly, except with the process of law.

( 2 ) IT would be necessary to state in brief the facts leading to thr filing of this petition, M/s. Economy Sales, respondent, filed a suit for declaration in which the following reliefs were claimed:

(A) Declare that plaintiff firm is a tenant in the suit property, namely front portion of 1, Sikandra Road, New Delhi together with a room as per site plan and that plaintiff s tenancy rights in the suit property are not in any manner affected by the compromise decree pass