( 1 ) PLEADINGS are complete.

( 2 ) RULE D. B.

( 3 ) HEARD the Counsel.

( 4 ) THIS petitioner is directed against the award dated 21. 7. 94 made by Labour Court-III, Delhi, whereby the termination of services of respondent No. 1 having been held to be illegal and unjustified, she has been directed to be reinstated with continuity of service. The Labour Court has further direct full back wages as per the regular pay scale alongwith the DA and Addl. DA to be paid to the respondent No. 1.

( 5 ) THE award is an ex-parte one against the employer. It appears that the employer had moved an application for setting aside the ex-parte proceedings which application has also been dismissed. The employer was filed this writ petition feeling aggrieved by both the orders i. e. the order forming basis of the award and the order refusing to set aside the ex-parte proceedings.

( 6 ) IT is not disputed that the respondent No. 1 is a workman. She was working as a Safai Karamchari w. e. f. 21. 12. 87 as a daily wager casual worker. She was being paid wages as fixed and revised from time to time under the Minimum Wages Act. Her services were terminated w. e. f. 7. 5. 1989 without assigning a