SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Del) 530

A.D.SINGH, S.D.PANDIT
S. HARCHARAN SING – Appellant
Versus
DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.P.KAPUR

ANIL DEV SINGH

( 1 ) BY this writ petition the petitioners, who are the highest bidders in the rental auction of shops/offices conducted by the Delhi Cantonment Board (for short "dcb"), question clause 12 of the terms and conditions of auction under which they are required to deposit sums equivalent to ten years rent for the commercial units for which bids were given by them. The facts giving rise to this writ petition are as under:

( 2 ) DCB construsted a shopping cum Commercial complex known as "kalpataru". The building consists of basement, ground floor, first floor and second floor and has shops, office complex (Cubicles and Hall), Terrace Restaurant etc. In regard to these DCB announced rental auction for July 21, 1994 and July 22, 1994. The interested persons were required to deposit a bank draft of Rs. 25,000. 00 drawn in favour of Cantonment Executive Officer, Cantonment Board, Delhi Cantonment as earnest money before their entry into the auction hall. According to the announcement the terms and conditions of the auction were available in the office of the Revenue Department, DCB and could be obtained on payment of Rs. 100. 00 during office hours on all working days w. e. f.











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top