SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Del) 496

VIJENDER JAIN, VUENDER JAIN
SASTMAN KODAK COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
M. R. ETECTRONICS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.D.Singh

Vijender Jain, J. (Oral)

( 1 ) THIS is a suit filed by the plaintiff, eastman Kodak Company , against the defendants for permanent injunction and for rendition of account. The plaintiff has prayed for obtaining a decree for. permanent injunction against the defendants from using the trade mark kodak or any other trade rnark deceptively similar thereto. The plaintiff has also prayed for a decree against the defendants to render the account of profits earned from the use of the trade mark KODAK upon or in relation to its goods and business. The plaintiff has valued the suit for the purposes of court fee and jurisdiction for a decree of permanent injunction at Rs. 200. 00 each and on which the court fee of Rs. 20. 00 each has been paid. For prayers (iii) and (v) for rendition of accounts and payment to the plaintiff for the purposes of jurisdiction are together valued at Rs. 5,05,000. 00 and it is stated that the plaintiff estimates that a sum in excess of that amount will befound due from the defendants. However, for the purposes of the court fee prayer (iii) and (v) are valued at Rs. 5,000. 00 each whereon the court fee of Rs. 638. 00 each has been paid. The Court at the outset fe











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top