SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Del) 746

USHA MEHRA
RAM NARAIN – Appellant
Versus
VED PARKASH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BAVA SHIV CHARAN SINGH, MUKUL ROHTAGI, RAJIV GEORGE, RAKESH SAHNI

USHA MEHRA

( 1 ) SHRI Ram Narain has sought for partition of the property situated in Abadi Area/laldora of Village Mangolpur Kalan, Delhi alleged to be owned jointly by the parties. The facts in brief are that after the death of the father of the plaintiff, the property devolved on the plaintiff and his brother Jai Narain and after Jai Narain s death on his legal heirs (defendants herein ). The said property has always been jointly owned. It has not been divided so far. In fact the plaintiff and the defendants have got equal share in the entire properties shown in the plan. The plaintiff is alleged to be in occupation of vacant plot measuring 300 sq. yards, built up property of 750 sq. yards and another built up plot of 550 sq. yards shown as b , d and e on the plan. Whereas defendants are shown to be in occupation of the old house measuring 350 sq. yards, built up area measuring 350 sq. yards, built up plot measuring 550 sq. yards Thus, according to plaintiff, he is in actual physical possession of 1600 sq. yards whereas the defendants occupies 1250 sq. yards. According to the plan, there is a vacant plot measuring 750 sq. yards mark e on the site plan. This the plaintiff a






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top