SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Del) 586

USHA MEHRA
BALDEV STIL PRIVATE – Appellant
Versus
EMPIRE DYEING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANAND PRASAD, R.K.GARG

Usha Mehra

( 1 ) BY this application the defendant wants to amend his written statement. He wants to insert the fact that one Shri S. G. Ghosh of M/s W. S. Atkin and Company, representative of the plaintiff visited the factory premises of the defendants at Bombay and inspected a 15 ton crane. Aftermaking a detailed inspection and testing the same, Mr. Ghosh for and on behalf of the plaintiff signed the inspection report certifying that the performance of the crane found satisfactory in all respects.

( 2 ) IT was alleged in the plaint that the plaintiff placed order for two cranes to be supplied by the defendants. On account of the default of the defendant in supplying the said cranes, this suit for specific performance was filed with alternative prayers either the two cranes be supplied or a decree for the amount deposited by the plaintiff with the defendants together with interest and damages be paid. In para 15-Aoftheplaint,ithasbeenspecifica]lypleaded that the plaintiff deputed its Planning Engineering and Management Consultants to inspect the cranes. The said representative visited the factory premises of the defendant at Bombay. They found several defects in the cranes. In the



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top