SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Del) 704

VIJENDER JAIN, VUENDER JAIN
K. K. PURI – Appellant
Versus
M. K. INDUSTRIES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ALOK SHUKLA, MUKUL ROHTAGI, Rakesh Munjal

Vijender Jain,j.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Order 39 Rule 2a read with Section 151 CPC. The application has been filed alleging that after the injunction order passed by this Court on 17. 3. 1989 the defendants in violation of the injunction order sold one lock to one Syed Iqbal Muneer in the presence of Notary Public. The injunction order dated 17. 3. 1989 reads as under :-

". . . . . I am satisfied from what has been stated in the plaint and in IA 2226 of 1989 which is an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 Civil Procedure Code. for restraining the defendants from using the linearly slidable lock covered by Indian Patent No. 16130, that an order, injuncting the defendants, their servants and agents from infringing Patent No. 161330, relatable to linearly slidable lock, should be passed, which injunction is hereby issued till the next date of hearing.

COUNSEL for the defendants who has filed a caveat, says that he will file reply within one week.

CASE for 29th March, 1989. "

( 2 ) MR. MUNJAL, learned counsel for the plaintiff, has argued that after the injunction order was passed defendant had willfully disobeyed the order of this Court and manufactured the disputed loc





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top