SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Del) 732

DEVENDER GUPTA
S. S. SIDHU – Appellant
Versus
RAMKISHAN KHANDUJA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.C.VERMA, RAJIV CHOPRA

Devinder Gupta

( 1 ) THIS is tenant s revision petition filed under Section25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as "the Act"), seekingto set aside an order passed on 1/04/1994, by Shri K. S. Khurana, Additional Rentcontroller, Delhi, rejecting his application, for leave to contest and also simultaneously passing an order of eviction in favour of the landlord/respondent.

( 2 ) ON 22/03/1993, a petition for eviction under Section 14 (l) (e) read withsection 25b of the Act was preferred TO by the landlord seeking tenant s eviction fromthe first floor of premises bearing No. D-15, Amar Colony, Lajpat Nagar-IV, Newdelhi. It was alleged that the premises in question comprising two rooms with akitchen, bath, W. C. along with front and back verandah had been let out to the tenanton 3/07/1974 for residential purpose, which was required bona fide by thelandlord for his own use and for the use and occupation of his family members. Thelandlord was not having any other alternate reasonably sufficient and suitableaccommodation for the purpose. His family members consists of his wife, a marriedson and three married daughters. The marriage of the son was solemnized on











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top