SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Del) 760

V.S.AGGARWAL
SUNIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ahmed Bakhash, N.K.Handa

V. S. Aggarwal,j.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal directed against the judgment and the order of sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, dated 28th February, 1991 and 2nd March, 1991 respectively. The appellant Sunil Kumar was held guilty of the offence punishable under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter REFERRED TO to. as the Act) and sentenced to ten years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. l,00,000. 00 (Rupees one lakh only ). In default of payment of fine, he was to undergo further simple imprisonment for one month.

( 2 ) THE sum and substance of the prosecution case is that on 19th August, 1990, Assistant Sub Inspector 0m Parkash was patrolling accompanied by Constables 0m Parkash, Balvinder Singh and Sumer Singh. While patrolling, they reached near Hanuman Mandir. Secret information was received that one person is sitting near Suthrishah Mandir and is selling charas. A raiding party was organised. Partap Singh son of Ram Singh, a public witness was joined in the raiding party. Other public persons refused to join the said raiding party.

( 3 ) AT about 9. 00 P. M. , Shri Chander Mohan, Officer Incharge of the Polic
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top